Art Imitates Life in ‘Bull’

Does art imitate life, or does life imitate art? Life is messy. And this week’s episode of “Bull” captured the essence of not only a messy life, but the angst that defendants experience when feeling wrongly accused. Dr. Jason Bull, the charming yet slightly narcissistic psychologist who runs a state-of-the-art trial sciences firm, has once again found a...
Read More

What Jurors Really Think, Part 4: Professionalism

Last week, I had the opportunity to talk with members of the Forensic Expert Witness Association about what jurors expect from expert witnesses. As I was preparing my speech, I was reminded that what happens inside the courtroom is not unlike what happens in the theatre: There are lead actors, supporting actors, protagonists, antagonists, conflict,...
Read More

What Jurors Really Think, Part 3: Presenting Evidence

As we continue digesting the information contained in the Cornell University School of Law Review article authored by Judge Amy St. Eve and former-law-clerk-now-law-firm-partner Gretchen Scavo, I want to shift the focus to the heart of the matter: presenting evidence. (If you haven’t already read my prior posts on this subject, they were on Organization and Delivery and...
Read More

What Jurors Really Think, Part 2: Delivery

In the world of law, where every word matters, attorneys are often so focused on crafting the perfect question, or squeezing the best facts into a 30-minute Opening Statement, that they forget about one critical element that can determine their success or failure with jurors: delivery. It’s no secret that the majority of communication is...
Read More